The claim is that under democratic US presidents the stock market annual averages were up by 6.7% historically since 1900 compared to +3.0% for republican presidents. The highest returns have been observed during periods with a Democrat President and either the House/Senate split between Democrats and Republicans or fully Republican. Negative returns have been achieved during a Republican presidency with the Senate Republican and the House Democrat (on average -1.7% annual returns). Though such a correlation observation has validity, business and economic cycles often are only partially influenced by the political parties in charge. Other factors such as central bank policies, global economic forces and timing of economic cycles have influence over the stock market. Thus I would regard this correlation matrix as interesting but not telling the entire story. A Republican or Democratic president may come into office during an economic favorably or disadvantaged time. For example, Bill ...
Comments
Post a Comment